
This kind of lack of common sense by no means ceases to blow my mind. Pj, I hate to break matlab to you, but by definition mankind, and every little thing we do, is engineering ‘a part of nature’ that has happened obviously. Or are anthills, beehives, termite mounds/dens or dens created by any creature for that remember, bears, wolves, etc, shells used by shellfish and hermit crabs, etc. , bird nests, and so forth, all unnatural too?As to a couple utopian magical planet being in balance with nature – gee, might you please clarify that to matlab dinosaurs?They existed for engineering greatly bigger time frame than man. Did in addition they become unnatural, doing unnatural matters to matlab planet, thus most suitable to their extinction?Just how “in balance with nature” was matlab planet all over each engineering matlab glacial intervals?Were these all “extremely poor states” among matlab planet and nature in which nature got miffed or something and was just giving our planet matlab cold shoulder?And, speaking of cold shoulders…. how did you have the capacity to divorce planets from nature to begin with?Is matlab moon not in balance with nature, seeing that matlab has no atmosphere or life?Did matlab planet Mercury REALLY tick nature off, thereby resulting in such engineering volatile red hot situation between matlab two of them?If so, let’s not even talk about matlab relationship engineering matlab Sun with Nature!Is Nature giving Neptune matlab cold shoulder?Are gas giants just planets where nature has engineering bad case of indigestion inflicting incredible excessive gas?Just when and the way did planets and nature turn out to be two separate entities, entities which are in some way magically in balance now and constantly, until, of course, matlab advent of modern man’s unnatural conduct?Inquiring minds are looking to know.